Archive for the ‘Books’ Category

Recommended Reading: “The Frozen Rabbi” by Steve Stern

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

For some reason, three of the most interesting books I’ve read this season have been about the 20th-century Jewish experience. Each of these treats the central tragedy of the Holocaust in an utterly different way. Julie Orringer’s “The Invisible Bridge” is a lush historical novel that follows a young Hungarian architect through Europe before, during, and after World War II; the book doesn’t skirt any horrors, but it is all about continuity of narrative. “Day for Night,” by Frederick Reiken (which I reviewed last week) takes a wholly different approach, circling a central mystery about a character who may or may not have survived a mass killing through the perspectives of over a dozen other characters.

In “The Frozen Rabbi,” accomplished novelist Steve Stern attacks the quandary of how the Jewish past affects the Jewish present, and while his book is on the surface the least connected to the Holocaust of these three, in its heart it is as conscious of that event as any Eli Wiesel book. The rest of the book deserves attention, but allow me to spend a few moments explaining why Stern’s approach is different and why I believe these books are appearing now.

Stern traces the history of a family we first come to know as the Karps of Memphis. It’s the late 1990s, and young scion Bernie has just discovered something in the basement Kelvinator. Bernie’s find and what happens next take up about half of the novel. Its other half is about how an Old World family survives the traumas inflicted on European Jewry over the last century.

Yet pogroms and kibbutzniks get more time than the Holocaust, which is relegated to the experience of Shprintze, Israeli immigrant and Ruben “Ruby” Karp’s short-lived first wife whose first-born son dies with her. Obviously, there is a lot of symbolism resting on Shprintze’s frail shoulders, and even more on her forearm’s “blue-inked tattoo.” By laying her to rest, is Stern saying that America’s Jews have forgotten something? Or repressed something? Or something else entirely?

It isn’t easy to tell from Stern’s treatment, but if the reader pays attention, she’ll see that this author is less interested in explaining how something so horrible happened than in tying it in to the larger story of where some American Jews come from and where they are today. That’s what I found in these three contemporary novels by Orringer, Reiken, and Stern: They are discovering new ways to write about an unspeakable thing with which they have little direct experience. As the years roll on and fewer and fewer of us have any links to survivors or liberators of the death camps, we have a choice about whether to remember or forget.

“The Frozen Rabbi” urges us to remember not just the tragic parts of Jewish history in the West (pogroms, stereotyping) but also the productive ones, like entrepreneurial spirit and resilience. A large part of that resilience, it would seem from Stern’s vigorously funny novel, is humor. From the moment young Bernie Karp finds 19th-century Rabbi Eliezer ben Zephyr’s icy sarcophagus in his family’s deep freeze (Bernie is — what else? — searching for a piece of liver with which to abuse himself, inspired by a certain novelist), the book’s action mixes magical realism with historical storytelling with huge, broad, Marx-Bros.-style laffs. At one point, the unfrozen, newly hip Rabbi tells Bernie that the answers he seeks “It’s all in the book…which it’s twenty-four ninety-five retail.” 

HA! What self-respecting American Jew would pay retail? But I digress…this is a book which it simply defies description. Stern is by turns solemn, gleeful, wry, sorrowful, and manic, yet it all works. I rarely wanted to put “The Frozen Rabbi” down. Even when one Karp ancestor turns to a life of mob crime and seems utterly unsympathetic, the author has a trick up his sleeve to redeem the moment. However, through all of the hijinks, the author also has a much more meaningful purpose: He shows that Judaism isn’t a mere matter of appearances. The Rabbi himself discards his shtreimel and phylacteries for Hefner-esque lounge garb, but remains a man of words. Characters may be Russian peasants clad in homespun or modern teenagers wearing tee-shirts, but they’re still Jewish. 

Somehow, Stern seems to be saying, it doesn’t matter how much we forget. What matters most is what we remember.

Bookapalooza Giveaway Winners

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

Oh ye (I’m looking at YOU, @thatneilguy) of little faith. You thought I might never get around to posting last week’s Twitter #fridayreads Bookapalooza winners…

First, why Bookapalooza? Because the wonderful Twitter users who chime in each week on Friday Reads to share their reading choices with the rest of the Twitterverse raised the roof: For the FIRST TIME, we got to over 700 participants. 

For each 500-participant Friday, I give away two ten-book hardcover bundles. Since we reached 600, I’ll give away FOUR of those this week. Keep reading for those…

However, since we reached 700 (!!!), I have something special. Five of you will receive five-book bundles of brand-new titles from five of the best imprints out there. So the ten-book folks get potluck, but you five Bookapalooza folks? You get a gourmet selection. Would you like to know what you’ll receive? Here you go:

Isn’t that a tasty group of books? 

First, the FOUR ten-book grab-bag giveaway winners:

@bookletting

@jtcricket269

@mokbyrd

@BrettMizelle

Now, the five #Bookapalooza winners!

@whatsheread

@edzaf

@tholmes86

@thatneilguy (You won! You won!)

@ohsugarsugar

If you are a winner, please send me your name and snailmail address: thebookmaven at gmail dot com.

Congratulations and thank you ALL!

I Hereby Proclaim July 14th Read What You Love Day

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

For my 25,000th tweet, I asked the Twitterverse what I should proclaim. One waggish tweep said “A national holiday?”

Why not? I may not be able to issue a federal edict, but I’ll just declare today — known as le jour de la Bastille in more Gallic quarters — National Read What You Love Day.

Read What You Love Day is all about its self-explanatory title. Stop reading what you think you should read and pick up a book you can’t wait to start.

I want to help, of course. I’ve put together a set of five 2010 books I simply love, and will give them away to a random reader who tells me here which book she’ll choose for this inaugural holiday celebration.

Here are the five books you could receive:

A Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan
The Passage by Justin Cronin
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot
Matterhorn by Karl Marlantes
The Possessed by Elif Batuman

Ready, set…GO!

UPDATE: 5:07 Eastern time — Random.org selected April Hawkins (Comment #30) as The Winner! April, please email your address to me: thebookmaven at gmail dot com. Congrats! Thanks to everyone who entered…READ WHAT YOU LOVE!

Summertime, and the Reading Should Be Easy

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Yesterday I started a Twitter meme called #palatecleansingbooks. I read three new-ish novels in one weekend — “The Pregnant Widow” by Martin Amis, “Day for Night” by Frederick Reiken, and “The Imperfectionists” by Tom Rachman. I needed to clear my head, and for me that head-clearing after a heavy bout of reading usually involves one or more of M.F.K. Fisher’s essay collections. In this case, the first title on my kitchen bookcase (um, yes, I have books in every room of the house, dining room and bathrooms included) was “With Bold Knife and Fork,” Mary Frances Kennedy Fisher’s late-life reflections on which foods are best in every category from nibbles to preserves. 

My own “palate-cleansing books” happen to be books about food, so the tag was an easy one for me to append. However, turns out that everyone’s definition of a book that refreshes is different. (As the French say of the gender divide, Vive la difference!) I thought I’d share a few of the responses I received here:

sherlock holmes. the end. #palatecleansingbooksless than a minute ago via web

I turn to the under-appreciated category of chick-lit after a peticularly hard read. #palatecleansingbooksless than a minute ago via UberTwitter


#palatecleansingbooks A little anthology ENGLISH COUNTRY HOUSE MYSTERIES Among inclusion parameters: Absolutely no character named Leftyless than a minute ago via web


#palatecleansingbooks Jane Austen: cool, clean, melon light, notes of cucumber.less than a minute ago via web


Laurie Colwin, Laurie Colwin, and then some more Laurie Colwin. #palatecleansingbooks. (My summer ritual, along w/GREAT GATSBY)less than a minute ago via web


@joe_hill Anything without spectroscopy, the words ‘included hardware’, or egg-like caricatures falling off a wall. #palatecleansingbooksless than a minute ago via web


For me it’s Larry Block, Walter Mosley, John D. MacDonald & @elmoreleonard. They’re my reset button. #palatecleansingbooksless than a minute ago via web

Recommended Reading: “Day for Night” by Frederick Reiken

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Many book critics experience burnout. For the months preceding my recent return to the reviewing stage, I believe I was finally getting a taste of that occupational hazard. I was reading — I never, ever stop reading — but I couldn’t summon up anything to say about the books I read. 

At least, that’s what I tried to tell myself. In reality, each time I read a review written by someone else of a book I’d loved (or loathed!), I would think “Oh yes! But what about this scene? You weren’t skeptical of that character?” And so on, and so forth. 

I wasn’t lacking in things to say. I was lacking the energy to say them. Burnout.

Fortunately, that particular period of burnout is in the past. I knew this for sure when I finished reading Frederick Reiken’s “Day for Night” (Reagan Arthur Books) and found that my fingers almost itched to hit the keyboard and talk about it.

Here is a novel that defies description, yet makes the reader long to describe it; a narrative that breaks rules, yet ultimately follows them; it starts with one world, yet conjures another that is both too near and too far from our modern experience.

Reiken begins in contemporary Florida: A woman named Beverly, her boyfriend David, and David’s son Jordan are on a vacation in Homosassa, about to take a swim with manatees. (Most of the modern parts of the book are set during the mid-1980s, which seems odd at first but quickly assumes its time-sensitive importance.) On a whim, Beverly goes to listen to their dive guide’s band at a local bar, and he shares an odd, marvelous sight with her: A submerged merry-go-round. 

That’s about all. The next chapter introduces us to new characters, including the dive guide’s sometime-girlfriend and band frontwoman, Dee. Ahhh, the reader thinks. A series of linked short stories. I’ve read books like this before. What will I learn about Dee? About Tim? What’s going on with her odd Utah family? Oh goody, a nice juicy horror tale about occult ritual abuse.

All wrong. It’s as if Reiken is re-layering an onion: The whole of the story will only be revealed by combining partially opaque, partially transparent layers filled with characters whose lives overlap both deliberately and serendipitously. Yet those layers truly do make up a whole. We know that Beverly spent her early childhood in Poland, and that fact is as important to the last few pages as it is to the first. Reiken accomplishes something quite elegant, usually only seen in the most puzzle-like mystery novels: He has a surprise (more than one, really) and he reveals it in his own time while never playing games with or attempting to trick the reader.

A few things can be told: This is essentially a book about the Holocaust. However, it is not a book that takes place during that horrific event, except for a few pages. It’s a book about the Holocaust’s reverberations — mostly bad, but a few good, because what interests Reiken is human connectedness, how each generation follows the many that have gone before, like so many horses on a carousel (that cover image is not an accident).

While each first-person chapter is compelling, I found something else equally so: Reiken’s use of natural locations, from marsh to ocean to Dead Sea to forest primeval. For his characters, whether male or female, old or young, recent or past, these places offer safety, renewal, and meaning. Those places are, of course, not wholly knowable. Since Reiken (who, as Julie Orringer noted in her Washington Post review, tips his hand early on about how we are all interconnected but may not know it) is playing with linear narrative, to understand “Day for Night,” readers have to abandon being able to know everything. We have to surrender and trust in Reiken’s vision.

Of course, his characters are in the same position – except that they don’t always have anyone to trust. Is God there? Or are other people all we have? Ultimately, this is a huge question that Reiken takes on in an inventive, beautiful, and relevant way. “Day for Night” is a novel that will win awards. More important, it’s a novel that should be read.

The Millennium Effing Trilogy OR Why I Dislike Stieg Larsson’s Books

Monday, June 28th, 2010

This morning, literally minutes before someone on Twitter posted Nora Ephron’s cheeky sendup of Lisbeth Salander and “Kalle Fucking Blomkvist” from The New Yorker, I told my friend R.:

me: I finally finished HORNET’S NEST and hated it so much 

myfriendr: Expository.

Turgid.

me: Tell don’t show, the Stieg Larsson motto!

myfriendr: the whole book was tell, tell, tell. Not a single scene rendered.

NB: R.’s AIM name has been changed to protect him, because he truly is innocent — he is not about to go on record saying that he dislikes The Book That Saved Publishing 2010. 

I share that exchange with you as a way of showing you — take note of that, “showing you” — that I have been annoyed about the Stieg Larsson phenomenon for a while. 

Before you flame me, dear readers, let me state a few facts:

1. I have read all three of the Stieg Larsson Lisbeth Salander novels in their entirety. 

2. I am an avid mystery reader.

3. I have read a great deal of Swedish mystery fiction, including most of Mankell, a great swath of Sjowall/Wahloo, and all of Peter Hoeg, and some Jo Nesbo. 

I just want to forestall the inevitable “If you’d read the books, you’d know how good they are!” and “You must just hate mysteries” and “You obviously don’t get the Swedish crime fiction mentality” comments. I’ve read the books, I love mystery novels, and I have even interviewed Henning Mankell in person. 

Now let me explain what it is I truly don’t like about Larsson’s books, and then you can feel free to flame me for those opinions.

If you’re reading this blog, you probably already have heard the phrase “Show, don’t tell.” It’s thrown at writers of every age and stage. Even elementary-school students are reminded that they can show that a character is angry instead of simply stating “He was angry.”

Of course, it isn’t as easy as it sounds to “show” rather than “tell.” If it were, there would be far more beautifully written books. Unfortunately, because people believe that they are “showing” things simply by writing them down, there are many, many badly written books. 

I won’t try to argue about whether or not Stieg Larsson is a good writer or a bad writer. What I will argue is that his Millennium Trilogy is rife with telling: “He was anything but pleased.” “In spite of his respect for Astrid Lindgren — whose books he loved — he detested the nickname.” And so on and so on. We never “see” anything in Larsson’s books, because the author is too busy describing the most mundane moments. Why do we need to know exactly how Lisbeth Salander puts her groceries away? The passage to which I refer from “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” does not in any way enhance our understanding of her much-mentioned but never confirmed Asperger’s Syndrome, or any of the other DSM-IV categories into which she might fall. It simply tells us how she puts the groceries away.

But the most important thing about the “Show, don’t tell” rule is that by showing and not telling, authors allow readers to take an active role in stories. One of the things I most detest about commercial fiction, even at its best, is that by telling us things it takes away our ability to feel those things, to imagine those things, and to react to them with authentic emotion. 

I welcome YOUR authentic emotions, now, about The Millennium Trilogy. Thanks for reading!

The Unbearable Lightness of Writing: For #215800

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Note; For more information about #215800, read this post from me and check out the entire experience at Bindu Wiles’ blog.

Today marks two weeks in the #215800 yoga/writing practice challenge, and I’d like to talk about endorphins.

We all know about “runner’s high” and the endorphin addiction that result from hard, consistent exercise. However, since my yoga choice for this challenge is spending 30 minutes, five days a week, in savasana or “corpse” pose, I’m not exactly chasing an exercise rush.

No, mine is a “writer’s high.” I’ve heard about this for years and years, known that many writers experience that elusive concept of “flow” — but I’d never found a process that worked well enough for me to get there.

I spoke in a previous blog entry about how powerful it has been for me to combine mindfulness with writing. In the past two weeks, I’ve written over 8,000 words on my novel in progress. Considering I hadn’t touched that “in progress” work for three years, that’s a lot of new material.

More important, though, is my experience of writing those words. It hasn’t been effortless. Like good, hard exercise, it’s taken determination and some huffing and puffing! Yet, like that exercise, once I’m in to the flow of writing, I don’t notice the work as much as I do the progress.

That’s why I’m paraphrasing the great Milan Kundera’s title, here: The work is hard — “unbearable” — yet I experience it as flow — “lightness.” 

May your own writing or reading go with the flow today! Peace be with you.

Recommended Reading: “The Ice Princess” by Camilla Läckberg

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

Contrary to popular opinion and press, people do talk about books in everyday life — at least they do in bookstores. I was in one of my fave local chain stores yesterday (a Virginian cannot always get to Politics & Prose!), and had a fairly spirited and informed discussion with a clerk and two other customers about

"The Ice Princess" by Camilla Lackberg

Swedish crime fiction. It happens that The Washington Post ran a long piece yesterday on this very topic, but that’s not how the conversation began. It started because one woman was buying a Stieg Larsson novel and I asked her if she’d read “The Ice Princess” by Camilla Läckberg, yet. 

“That book was mentioned in the Post today!” she said. (I won’t go into detail about the article except to wonder: How could they not have mentioned Maj Sjowall and Per Wahloo?) I told her I’d read Lackberg’s first American release a few weeks ago. Before I knew it, four of us were off and running, chatting about l’affaire Larsson (Will his life partner ever give up the partially finished fourth manuscript? Did you see the movie? etc.).

I realize that I haven’t posted any reviews of anything in a long time here, but that’s going to change — and I think talking about “The Ice Princess” is the perfect way to kick off that change, because while I really enjoyed the book, I have some cavils with it, too.

I realize that I haven’t posted any reviews of anything in a long time here, but that’s going to change — and I think talking about “The Ice Princess” is the perfect way to kick off that change, because while I really enjoyed the book, I have some cavils with it, too.

Others did not have the same cavils: Publishers Weekly and Booklist both gave “The Ice Princess” starred reviews. I think that may be due to the sheer joy of reading a Scandinavian crime novel that is written by a woman — a young woman, with a modern sensibility. Some of the things I liked best about Läckberg’s book were its feminine preoccupations. You may find a mystery protagonist obsessing about which lingerie to don for a romantic evening silly, but I found it a refreshing change from middle-aged detectives smoking and drinking beer.

The protagonist here is not male and not a detective; she’s Erica Falck, a thirty-something nonfiction writer who returns to her hometown of Fjällbacka in order to clear out her family home after her parents are killed in an auto accident. When she finds an old friend hideously dead, another old friend, Patrik (conveniently a police officer), gets involved. 

Then Erica and Patrik get involved — and while there’s plenty more going on in this novel, with the Swedish equivalent of Southern lit gothic characters creeping around, I found the mature affair between these two to be one of the highlights of the book. Läckberg doesn’t play games with the reader about her lovebirds. They’re not deliberately kept apart or forced to flirt through this book so that we can have them consummate their relationship in another volume. Both a little gun shy, Erica and Patrik are a thinking woman’s Sam and Diane. 

However, it’s not just the romantic relationship that drives this book — It’s also the relationship each and every one of us has with our family and hometown of origin. There’s some repetitive writing and dialogue in “The Ice Princess” (I could not possibly blame that on Läckberg without being able to read Swedish) and some wooden characterization (e.g., the matriarch of Fjällbacka’s most illustrious family, Nelly Lorentz, is nearly a Grimm’s witch), but the push-and-pull Erica feels about her past makes this a book with a decidedly different “Swedish crime” bent.

Solitude: For #215800

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Many of my friends are single, and some of those single friends have always been thus: Never married, partnered, whatever. I’ve learned that I and those friends have very different approaches to social obligations. For many people who live alone (some of them work alone, too, telecommuting from houses and apartments), getting out of the house with others, or even having people in for dinner, is a treat. This isn’t because they are necessarily lonely. In fact, most of the people I know who live alone are quite happy with their own company. 

No, it’s because that social obligation is a break from the normal routine. So today was for me. My husband took our two teenaged (well, one will be 13 in a few months!) daughters to a regional big loud overcrowded too-hot amusement park. All three of them know better than to drag me along. The last time they did so, I wound up perched on a fiberglass toadstool in the kiddy section, trying to get cell phone reception so I could talk to a magazine editor in New York.

The noisy trio departed this morning at nine and won’t be home until that hour tonight. I had no meetings scheduled today, and so time has unfolded with the kind of calm dignity that it has when there are no unwelcome interruptions. I put the dogs out and let them back in. I made and took some business calls. I did some writing for work and my usual amount of tweeting. Since I’m following this #215800 discipline, I spent 30 minutes in a yogic corpse pose doing prana breathing. I broke for lunch and a short reading session, did some more work, and suddenly it was six o’clock: Time to feed the dogs, rustle up some dinner for myself, and think about my evening.

Sounds good, right? It was! What a calm, productive, and lovely day.

I. want. more.

What struck me, especially during the suddenly quiet morning hours, was how much I craved a day without obligations. The odd thing is that I don’t necessarily have that many obligations! Although I am married and have two children, but spouse and daughters are remarkably and blessedly self-sufficient. They do not require me to care for them first and myself second.

However, they do generate a lot of energy and noise when they’re around. There’s always a television on, a radio blaring, voices, footsteps, clanking cabinet doors… This is all normal. Happy, even! But after a week of practicing mindful yoga and writing, I decided to let myself want the silence. The more of it I get, the more content and relaxed I am. 

In other words, I would like this break from my routine to be part of my routine. It is probably time for me to start thinking about applying for a writer’s retreat. I welcome anyone else’s thoughts about solitude and creativity! I hope your Tuesday has come to a quiet end.

Liturgy and Energy: About #215800

Saturday, June 12th, 2010

Last week, after a long, long weekend of activity and stress (I had my parents-in-law visiting and my eldest daughter was preparing for her senior prom), I tweeted “Yea, verily, today is a day of rest.” One woman responded and said “What a great word; we don’t hear ‘verily’ all that often.”

She’s right — but some of us heard it early and often, at church. When I was a wee lassie, the Episcopal Church in which I was raised still used what is now referred to as The 1928 Prayer Book, and it was full of deeply connotative language, including words like “verily” and “yea” and “unworthy.” I was even taught, pre-confirmation (by that time, the Church had a new Book of Common Prayer), to strike the left side of my chest a certain number of times during the Great Confession to “acknowledge and bewail my manifold sins and wickednesses.”

The thing is, I remember that so well, and now I know why I remember it so well: Whenever I combine an action with words, it sticks with me. I believe this makes me a “kinaesthetic” learner (I’d always believed I was a visual learner, but that is probably because I’ve always been pretty sedentary — you can’t realize that movement helps you when you’re sitting still).

A few weeks ago I began to consider how and why certain pieces of the sacred were affecting my life. I won’t go too far into my musings, because that would be boring — the important thing is that I realized for writers of nearly all stripes, early experiences with worship and ritual strongly influence our work. No wonder I am at ease throwing phrases like “Yea, verily” around. I learned that “foreign” language at a life stage that allows imprinting.

However, liturgy of any kind has more power than that. We sit, stand, and kneel in my church to remind us of how our words connect to our actions, but also of how they connect to our souls/psyches/spirits. I’d forgotten this until my friend Bindu Wiles announced her Twitter community practice of #215800: 21 days, 5 days a week, of writing 800 words and doing some kind of yoga each day along with that writing. Each participant has the option of taking a yoga class, using a yoga DVD, or spending 15-30 minutes each day in savasana or “corpse” pose.

Since I’m a yoga newbie, I decided to try the latter. I’ve been doing savasana for 20-30 minutes each day while listening to Taize chants. “Taize chants” are the quiet, repetitive hymns of an ecumenical Christian community founded in France after World War II by a monk named Brother Roger. Many Protestant churches have regular Taize services, and that’s how I was introduced to this music. A few years ago while vacationing in Burgundy with some dear friends my husband and I visited the town of Taize and the community grounds. We attended a simple noonday service in the town church and listened to the Taize brothers sing their chants. My friend, a preacher’s kid and a lifelong active Christian, turned to me and said “I got more out of that hour than I ever have out of weeklong women’s retreats.”

I tell you all that because I believe — no, feel — that Taize, like yoga, is all about mindfulness. “Mindfulness” is the part I’d been leaving out of my writing practice all of these years. I knew I couldn’t and shouldn’t wait for inspiration. I knew I had to apply “bum glue” and just stay in my chair and before the blank or partially scribbled on page. I knew I should just write — morning pages, freewriting, journal entries, whatever. I knew all of these things, yet yea, verily, still I did not write.

I’ve been working on a novel for several years, now. The last time I wrote a single word on that novel was in 2007. Yet after just one session of savasana, I wrote 800 words. As of today, I’ve written 4,000 words. 

That might now be remarkable in and of itself. I know that there are writers out there who have spates of productivity and churn out thousands of words in a single day. What is remarkable about this is how contented I’ve been while doing it. The writing isn’t necessarily easy, or seamless, or perfect. This practice is not effortless. It is, however, beautiful and gratifying. 

All those days, weeks, months, years, decades, I left out the one thing I needed: Mindfulness. For you, the thing “left out” in your writing might be different. Yet I urge you to consider intention and ritual. No, not the kind of ritual that involves making tea the way you like it or making sure you have the right kind of Uniball pens. A ritual that connects you with something more than yourself and your own process, a ritual that connects you to the divine.

Namaste. And in the words of my own church: Peace be with you.